Galdamez-Lainez

Galdamez-Lainez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-3895California1,151 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL GALDAMEZ-LAINEZ, et al., No. 23-3895 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A209-219-275

A209-219-276

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: TYMKOVICH***, M. SMITH and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Galdamez-Lainez and his minor son petition for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order upholding an Immigration Judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Timothy M. Tymkovich, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 determination that they were not entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, or

protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.