Cristobal Francisco v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-3691California628 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAQUEL CRISTOBAL No. 23-3691 FRANCISCO; FRANKLIN ALFREDO Agency Nos.
MIGUEL CRISTOBAL, A220-309-087
A220-309-086
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 2, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Raquel Cristobal Francisco and her son, F.A.M.C., are natives and
citizens of Guatemala. Petitioners seek review of the Board of Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the…