Cristobal Francisco v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-3691California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAQUEL CRISTOBAL No. 23-3691 FRANCISCO; FRANKLIN ALFREDO Agency Nos.

MIGUEL CRISTOBAL, A220-309-087

A220-309-086

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Raquel Cristobal Francisco and her son, F.A.M.C., are natives and

citizens of Guatemala. Petitioners seek review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.