Vicencio

People v. Vicencio

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2024E082997California1,224 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

In June 2011, a Riverside County jury convicted Esteban Vicencio of seven counts

of committing a lewd act on a 14- or 15-year-old victim when he was at least ten years

older (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (c)(1), unlabeled statutory citations refer to this code) and

one count of oral copulation on a child under ten years old (§ 288.7, subd. (b)).

Prosecutors sought to enhance Vicencio’s sentence because he had served a prison

term for a Michigan conviction for assault with intent to commit sexual penetration. The

court found Vicencio had a prison prior (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). It sentenced Vicencio to a

determinate 15-year prison term, plus an indeterminate term of 30 years to life. Included

in the sentence was a one-year prison prior enhancement. We affirmed the judgment.

(People v. Vicencio (Oct. 23, 2012, E054311) [nonpub. opn.].)

In November 2023, after a referral from the California Department of Corrections

and Rehabilitation, Vicencio’s case was calendared for a hearing to determine his

2 eligibility for recall and resentencing under section 1172.75. Vicencio argued his prior

Michigan conviction did not disqualify him from relief, arguing section 1172.75…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.