People v. Toner CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2024B335033California635 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/5/24 P. v. Toner CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B335033 (Super. Ct. No. 2016012695) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

SEAN ERIC TONER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Sean Eric Toner appeals the trial court’s order committing him to the State Department of State Hospitals as a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predators Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 6600 et seq.) We appointed counsel to represent Toner on appeal. After an examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no arguable issues and requested that we follow the procedures set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441 (Wende), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.