Sicking

Sicking v. City of Upland CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2024E082066California6,628 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/5/24 Sicking v. City of Upland CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

LOIS SICKING,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E082066

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVSB2118832)

CITY OF UPLAND, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Donald R. Alvarez,

Judge. Affirmed.

Briggs Law Corporation, Cory J. Briggs, and Janna M. Ferraro for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Best Best & Krieger and Amy E. Hoyt for Defendant and Respondent.

The City of Upland (the City) applied for a grant from the California Department

of Parks and Recreation (the Department) to renovate and revitalize a local park.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.