Santoyo

United States v. Santoyo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202424-82California345 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-82 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-02025-MKD-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

BRADLEY PAUL SANTOYO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Bradley Paul Santoyo appeals the district court’s 60-month sentence

following his guilty plea for possessing a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

Santoyo contends that the district court abused its discretion by imposing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.