Santoyo
United States v. Santoyo
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202424-82California345 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-82 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-02025-MKD-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
BRADLEY PAUL SANTOYO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 4, 2024** Seattle, Washington
Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Bradley Paul Santoyo appeals the district court’s 60-month sentence
following his guilty plea for possessing a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.