Palomo

Palomo v. Kosch

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20243:24-cv-01344California2,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN PALOMO, Case No.: 24cv1344-LL-BJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE AND DENYING AS

LOIS KOSCH, et al.,

MOOT ALL PENDING MOTIONS

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 2, 7, 18, 28] 16

On May 30, 2024, Plaintiff Jonathan Palomo filed a complaint against Defendants Lois Kosch; Joseph Paller; Nicole Roysdon; Jeremy Abate; and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ECF No. 1-4. Before the Court are multiple motions to dismiss the complaint, quash service of the summons and complaint, and hold oral argument. ECF Nos. 2, 7, 18, 28. These matters are fully briefed, and the Court deems them suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1. For the reasons below, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the complaint and DENIES AS MOOT all pending motions. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.