Holland

(PC) Murillo v. Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20241:15-cv-00266California1,748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN MURILLO, No. 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

K. HOLLAND, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 147, 153) 16 Plaintiff Joaquin Murillo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 29, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 147) be denied because there are genuine issues of material fact on the questions of whether Defendants Warden K. Holland and Deputy Warden J. Gutierrez are entitled to qualified immunity and whether they acted with deliberate indifference to a serious risk of harm to inmate safety when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.