Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20243:22-cv-00412California673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMESURF, INC., Case No.: 22-cv-412-RSH-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING INTUIT’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

INTUIT, INC., [Dkt. No. 81] Defendant. 16 Before the Court is Defendant Intuit, Inc.’s motion to compel. Dkt. No. 81. Intuit seeks discovery regarding “individuals or entities with an ownership, financial, or other interest in the outcome of any litigation, enforcement effort, or licensing effort involving the patents-in-suit and/or related patents/applications or in the asserted patents.” Dkt. No. 81-1 at 2. Specifically, Intuit seeks an order compelling Plaintiff Samesurf, Inc., to respond to its Interrogatory No. 11 and Request for Production No. 42. The Court heard argument on the motion on December 4, 2024. For the reasons stated below and on the record during the December 4 hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: Regarding Interrogatory No. 11, the Court finds the identities of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.