Hipschman
Hipschman v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22CV0903-AJB (BLM) CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN; ALEXANDER
HIPSCHMAN,
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, GRANTING IN PART JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE RE RULE 30(b)(6) v. WITNESS AND CONTINUE EXPERT
DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND RELATED
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., DATES Defendants. [ECF No. 129]
17 18 Currently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion and Request to Extend Deposition of Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) Witness and Continue Expert Discovery Cutoffs and other related Dates in Scheduling Order. See Mot., ECF No. 129. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. LEGAL STANDARD Once a Rule 16 scheduling order is issued, dates set forth therein may be modified only “for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Federal Rule…