Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20243:23-cv-01847California911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO., Case No.: 3:23-cv-01847-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND

CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS,

DEADLINES

INC.,

15 Defendant. [ECF No. 38] 16 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 38. The parties seek an order from the Court extending certain case management deadlines by approximately two weeks to one month. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”); see also Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). Courts have broad discretion in determining whether there is good cause.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.