Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20241:21-cv-01461California4,591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

v. Pretrial Hearing: March 21, 2025, at 9:30 a.m.

C. PFEIFFER, et al., Motions in Limine Hearing: April 10, 2025, at Defendants. 11:00 a.m.

16 Jury Trial: April 29, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days

19 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 20 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 10, 178.) 21 This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. 22 Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The 23 case is ready to be set for jury trial. 24 This matter is set for a pretrial conference hearing on March 21, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. The 25 matter is set for a 2 to 3 day jury trial beginning on April 29, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. 26 /// 27 /// 28 In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.