Beyard

Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20241:21-cv-01063California1,692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Denise Beyard, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Denise Beyard, Caroline Cardoza and Calvin James allege Pentagon Federal Credit Union wrongly charged them duplicative fees for insufficient account balances. The credit union moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and its asks this court to reconsider the assigned Magistrate Judge’s decision not to reach a similar jurisdictional dispute. As explained in this order, the court grants the motion to dismiss with leave to amend, and denies as moot the motion 22 for reconsideration. 23 I. ALLEGATIONS This case was originally filed on behalf of Pangnhia Vue, a member of the credit union who alleged it had assessed her duplicative $30 fees for insufficient funds. See Compl. □ 14-25, ECF No. 1. According to her complaint, her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.