Pattison

Pattison v. HP Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20243:24-cv-02752California2,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARY PATTISON, Case No. 24-cv-02752-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STRIKE

HP INC., CLASS ALLEGATIONS; AFFORDING

PLAINTIFF LIMITED LEAVE TO

Defendant. AMEND; SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

11 Before the Court is defendant HP Inc.'s ("HP") "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike," filed October 22, 2024. Plaintiff Mary Pattison ("Pattison") has filed opposition, to which HP has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion,1 the Court rules as follows.2 In her Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), Pattison alleges she and HP entered into a contract titled "HP Care Pack Support Terms" (hereinafter, "Terms") (see Quarles Decl., filed August 9, 2024, Ex. A),3 and that she did so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.