Roe AH 71 v. Doe 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20242:24-cv-09544California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-9544 FMO (JCx) Date December 5, 2024 Title Roe AH 71 v. Doe 1, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Order to Show Cause On August 23, 2024, plaintiff, using the pseudonym “Jane Roe AH 71,” filed a complaint in state court against several Doe defendants. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at □□ 1); (Dkt. 1-1, Complaint). Defendants Does and removed the action to this court based on diversity jurisdiction. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at { 3). Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the title of the complaint “must name all the parties.” However, the Ninth Circuit has held that a request for anonymity may be granted if “the [requesting]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.