(PC)Dorsey

(PC)Dorsey v. Youngblood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20241:24-cv-00383California647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS DORSEY, 1:24-cv-00383-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FILED DECEMBER 3, 2024

DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., (Doc. 14)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Thomas Dorsey is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed his original complaint on April 2, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On September 17, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 11.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint violated Rules 18 and 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and granted Plaintiff 21 days within which to file a first amended complaint, curing the deficiencies identified by the Court, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 4-16.) On October 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) On December 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.