Calamco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CALAMCO, Case No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-CSK Plaintiff,

V. ORDER GRANTING AMENDED

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

J.R. SIMPLOT CO.,

(ECF No. 125) Defendant. 13 The Court has reviewed the parties’ amended stipulated protective order below 15 || (ECF No. 125), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local 16 || Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the amended protective order, subject to 17 || the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 19 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 20 || 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 21 || (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 22 || jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the…