(PC) Magana v. CSP Solano CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN A. MAGANA, No. 2:23-cv-2007 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CSP SOLANO CDCR, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 31, 2024, the court screened the complaint and found that plaintiff had not stated any claims for relief except for an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Cortez for failing to provide pain medication. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given the option of amending the complaint or proceeding immediately on his cognizable claim against defendant Cortez. Id. at 4. He was further advised that if he failed to notify the court how he wanted to proceed, the court would assume that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened. Id. The time for plaintiff to notify the court as to how he wishes to proceed has now passed, and plaintiff has not made an election or otherwise…