Devra Haney-Williams v. Sam's West, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-15568California1,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEVRA HANEY-WILLIAMS, No. 23-15568

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02900-JCM-EJY v.

SAM’S WEST, INC., DBA Sam’s MEMORANDUM* Pharmacy, No. 10-4974,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JUBILANT CADISTA

PHARMACEUTCALS, INC.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2024 Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Devra Haney-Williams (“Haney”) appeals the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court’s order that (a) granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee

Sam’s West, Inc. (“Sam”) because the opinions of Haney’s experts Mark C. Decerbo

and Michael R. Iglinski, as contained in their respective declarations, failed to

present a triable issue of fact as to the element of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.