Hansack

United States v. Hansack

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-1359California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1359 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00021-SVW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW ZEPEDA HANSACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, LEE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Zepeda Hansack appeals from the seventy-two-month sentence

imposed following his guilty plea to two counts of aiding and assisting in the

preparation of a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). Hansack

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). argues that his sentence was both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. As

the parties are familiar with the facts,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.