Rodriguez Ramos v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-1683California602 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARISELA RODRIGUEZ No. 23-1683 RAMOS; K.R.R.; VALENTE Agency Nos.

RODRIGUEZ RAMOS; ISABEL A202-158-416

SALAZAR GONZALEZ; F.R.S., A202-158-417

A202-157-717

Petitioners,

A202-157-718

A202-157-719

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Marisela Rodriguez Ramos, Valente Rodriguez Ramos, K.R.R.,

Isabel Salazar Gonzalez, and F.R.S. (collectively, “Petitioners”) are family

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). members who are natives and citizens of Mexico.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.