Rodriguez Ramos v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-1683California602 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARISELA RODRIGUEZ No. 23-1683 RAMOS; K.R.R.; VALENTE Agency Nos.
RODRIGUEZ RAMOS; ISABEL A202-158-416
SALAZAR GONZALEZ; F.R.S., A202-158-417
A202-157-717
Petitioners,
A202-157-718
A202-157-719
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Marisela Rodriguez Ramos, Valente Rodriguez Ramos, K.R.R.,
Isabel Salazar Gonzalez, and F.R.S. (collectively, “Petitioners”) are family
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). members who are natives and citizens of Mexico.…