Nantipia-Velecela

Nantipia-Velecela v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202424-208California1,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANZ GABRIEL NANTIPIA- No. 24-208 VELECELA; ERIKA ROCIO OCHOA- Agency Nos.

BRITO; NANTAR ITZCHEL NANTIPIA- A220-236-565

OCHOA, A220-236-566

A220-236-567

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Franz Gabriel Nantipia-Velecela (“Franz”), the lead petitioner, Erika Rocio

Ochoa-Brito (“Erika”), Franz’s wife, and their daughter (collectively,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “Petitioners”) are citizens of Ecuador, who entered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.