Muniz De Souza v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-3726California1,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLEISON MUNIZ DE SOUZA; CLAIRE No. 23-3726 MARTINS DA SILVA MUNIZ; JOAO Agency Nos.

MARTINS MUNIZ SOUZA; EMANUELY A220-553-375

MUNIZ MARTINS SILVA, A220-553-376

A220-553-377

Petitioners,

A220-553-378

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BENNETT, BRESS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Gleison Muniz De Souza (“De Souza”), a native and citizen of

Brazil, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) upholding the denial of his applications for asylum and withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.