Martinez-Arbe

Martinez-Arbe v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-3319California867 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOSIAH ARTURO MARTINEZ- No. 23-3319 ARBE; MARIA ZOILA PEREGRINA Agency Nos.

SANDOVAL-BARTRA; D.N.M.S.; A243-148-382

A.D.M.S.; B.M.M.S., A243-148-383

A243-148-384

Petitioners,

A243-148-385

A243-148-386

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 21, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: MILLER, LEE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Mosiah Arturo Martinez-Arbe, Maria Zoila Peregrina Sandoval-Bartra, and

their minor children, D.N.M.S., A.D.M.S., and B.M.M.S.—natives and citizens of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peru—petition for review of a decision of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.