Hernandez-Lopez

Hernandez-Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-3428California394 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 6 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, No. 23-3428 Agency No. Petitioner, A077-119-099 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Hernandez-Lopez petitions for review of the order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Lopez’s motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to reopen because Hernandez-Lopez did not present material evidence of changed

country conditions that was “not available and would not have been discovered or

presented at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.