Cruz Chable v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 202423-3004California1,117 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS CRUZ CHABLE, No. 23-3004 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-547-122 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner, Santos Cruz Chable, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a decision by

the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for withholding of removal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

Where, as here, the BIA affirms…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.