Baker
Baker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
DEC 6 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUSTIN BAKER, No. 23-4364 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00162-TOR v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 2, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: BENNETT, BRESS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Justin Baker appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
of his employer, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), on his claims of retaliation in
violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
(USERRA), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., and the Washington Law Against
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Discrimination (WLAD), Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.210.…