Ashford
Ashford v. City of Brownsville
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 6 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GAYLE ASHFORD, No. 23-2804 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 6:19-cv-01540-IM v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF BROWNSVILLE, a municipal corporation of Oregon; SCOTT MCDOWELL, City Administrator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 3, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Gayle Ashford (“Ashford”) applied to the Planning
Commission of Defendant City of Brownsville (the “City”) for a conditional use
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). permit to expand her medical marijuana business to include recreational marijuana
sales. Defendant Scott McDowell (“McDowell”), the City…