People v. Major CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 2024E082616California2,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying him recall and resentencing

relief under section 1172.75. We disagree.

As a preliminary matter, we reject respondent’s request to dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction, citing People v. Burgess (2022) 86 Cal.App.5th 375 (Burgess). In

Burgess, the court held that a trial court lacks jurisdiction under section 1172.75 to

adjudicate a defendant’s own motion for resentencing, and appellate courts lack

jurisdiction over appeals from the denial of such a motion. (Id. at p. 382.) People v. Cota

(2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 318 (Cota) explained the basis for this rule, as follows:

“[S]ection 1172.75 does not authorize a defendant to seek resentencing on his or her own

motion or petition. Rather the process is triggered by the [California] Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation [hereafter CDCR] identifying a defendant as a person

3 serving a sentence that includes a prior prison term enhancement. [Citation.]” (Id. at

p. 332; see § 1172.75(b).)

Here, we granted defendant’s request for judicial notice of materials indicating he

was among Riverside County inmates listed by the CDCR in June 2022 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.