Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. CH2M Hill Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20243:20-cv-04704California1,293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TETRA TECH EC, INC., Case No. 20-cv-04704-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

CH2M HILL INC., et al., Defendants.

The order of dismissal left plaintiff Tetra Tech EC Inc. with the first and second contract claims to litigate. See Dkt. No. 91. Now that the evidentiary record is fully developed, summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants on these claims. See Dkt. No. 141 (summary judgment motion). The parties’ familiarity with the record and legal standards is assumed. In pertinent summary, Tetra Tech’s first claim is for inducing a breach of contract, and the second claim is for intentional interference with contractual relations. See Dkt. No. 55 ¶¶ 99-119. Each claim concerns the “contracts and task orders for environmental remediation at Hunters Point” that were entered into by Tetra Tech and the United States Navy, “including Contract N62472-10-D-0809, Task Orders 0002, 0007, and 0012, and Contract N62473-12-D-2006, Task Order 004.” Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.