Brink

Brink v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20243:23-cv-01756California1,746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 23cv1756 DMS (SBC)

JEREMY BRINK,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SECOND v. MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; DOE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES 1-5, Individually; 13 DOE SHERIFF'S NURSES 6-10, Individually, Inclusive Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Defendant San Diego County’s (“Defendant” or “the County”) Motion to Dismiss Counts Three and Five, (ECF No. 18), from Plaintiff Jeremy Brink’s Second Amended Complaint, ((“SAC”), ECF No. 17), for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, (ECF No. 20), and Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 23.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND The background of this case is set forth in detail in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.