Edwards

Edwards v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20243:24-cv-01118California3,693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMERON EDWARDS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1118-JAH-BJC

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 14 MOTION TO DISMISS; and CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,

GRANTING IN PART AND

16 Defendants. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE.

18 [ECF No. 3]

INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant City of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or “City of San Diego”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 12, Motion to Strike or, in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement. ECF No. 3 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiff Cameron Edwards (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a response in opposition to the Motion on September 4, 2024. ECF No. 7 (“Opposition” or “Opp’n”). Defendant filed a reply in support of its Motion on September 11, 2024. ECF No. 10 (“Reply”). Defendant’s Motion is decided on the parties’ briefs without oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.