Jackson v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20245:22-cv-04380California1,682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SYLVIA JACKSON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04380-PCP (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DECEMBER 3, 2024

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

TESLA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendant.

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning whether Tesla may obtain discovery regarding work performed by plaintiffs’ non-testifying consultant. Dkt. No. 54. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court will permit Tesla to obtain discovery regarding work performed by the consultant. I. BACKGROUND According to plaintiffs, a consultant who is not expected to testify at trial reviewed complaints of unintended acceleration (“UA”) in the NHTSA’s Vehicle Operator Questionnaire (“VOQ”) database, using criteria and instructions supplied by plaintiffs’ expert Dr. Singer, and identified which complaints…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.