Williams v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 THOMAS WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-CSK
Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.
14 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant1 County of Sacramento’s (“County”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff2 Thomas Williams (Plaintiff) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 68.) The County filed a reply. (ECF No. 71.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the County’s Motion for Summary Judgment. /// /// /// 23 The County of Sacramento is the only Defendant who is party to the instant motion for summary judgment. Defendants City of Rancho Cordova, Nathan Daniel (“Daniel”), Joseph Zalec (“Zalec”), and Derek Hutchins (“Hutchins”) (collectively, “City Defendants”) filed a 25 separate motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 64.)
26 Plaintiff’s brother, Carlos Williams, filed a separate lawsuit against the County and City Defendants (“Carlos Williams Action”). (No.…