Williams v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20242:20-cv-00598California4,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 THOMAS WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-CSK

Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

14 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant1 County of Sacramento’s (“County”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff2 Thomas Williams (Plaintiff) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 68.) The County filed a reply. (ECF No. 71.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the County’s Motion for Summary Judgment. /// /// /// 23 The County of Sacramento is the only Defendant who is party to the instant motion for summary judgment. Defendants City of Rancho Cordova, Nathan Daniel (“Daniel”), Joseph Zalec (“Zalec”), and Derek Hutchins (“Hutchins”) (collectively, “City Defendants”) filed a 25 separate motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 64.)

26 Plaintiff’s brother, Carlos Williams, filed a separate lawsuit against the County and City Defendants (“Carlos Williams Action”). (No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.