(PS) Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20242:21-cv-01539California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 2:21-cv-1539-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Michael A. Bruzzone moves the court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to vacate the order dated November 11, 2022, declaring him to be a vexatious litigant and entering a pre-filing order applicable to further pro se actions initiated by plaintiff against defendant Intel Corporation. (ECF No. 29.) Defendant filed a response in opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 30.) On October 25, 2024, the presiding district judge referred this motion to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF No. 31.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion to vacate should be denied. I. Background On or about April 10, 2018, plaintiff commenced his first pro se, in forma pauperis action in the Eastern District of California against Intel and other defendants. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.