Pierce
(PC) Murphy v. Pierce
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:21-cv-1789-TLN-CSK (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. PIERCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 09, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of…