Comer

Comer v. County of Sutter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20242:22-cv-00079California2,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY COMER, No. 2:22-cv-00079-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SUTTER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on the County of Sutter, Sheriff Brandon Barnes, Mark Hylen, Ernesto Chavez, Harrison Eide, and Michael Aguilar’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Bifurcate. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff Jeffrey Comer (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from an officer-involved shooting on October 9, 2020, in unincorporated Sutter County near the Feather River. (ECF No. 36 at 3-4.) Sutter County Deputies shot Plaintiff while he was being arrested on an outstanding warrant for attempted murder. (ECF No. 35 at 2.) Plaintiff alleges he was unarmed and riding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.