(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA CARRIE ROGERS,

Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-00475-TLN-CKD

13 v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants,

17 18 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Paula Carrie Rogers’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney and the undersigned. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff’s motion to recuse Magistrate Judge Delaney was previously denied. (ECF No. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court now also DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to recuse the undersigned. /// /// /// /// /// In seeking the undersigned’s recusal, Plaintiff invokes 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S.C § 455. (ECF No. 35 at 2–8.) “The substantive standard for recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455 is the same: whether a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” United States v. Hernandez, 109 F.3d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir. 1997) (quotation…