Icban

(PC) Porter v. Icban

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20242:24-cv-00696California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LAMAR PORTER, No. 2:24-cv-0696-TLN-SCR (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. ICBAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 4, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. The deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.