Prudhle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICO RILEY, Case No. 2:24-cv-1363-TLN-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. ORDER PRUDHLE, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 5, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on petitioner, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 …