(PS) Avila v. NewRez LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20242:24-cv-02264California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID AVILA, et al., No. 2:24-cv-02264-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER NEWREZ, LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs David Avila and John Hayne, proceeding pro se, filed this action to challenge a mortgage foreclosure of their home. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 4, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed, and the deadline has passed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.