Kaibinuer Yusufujiang v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202419-72001California322 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
DEC 9 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAIBINUER YUSUFUJIANG, No. 19-72001
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-227-317
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 5, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Kaibinuer Yusufujiang petitions for review of the order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of a
motion to reopen removal proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of
discretion, Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland, 32 F.4th 794, 800 (9th Cir. 2022), and we
deny the petition for review in…