Kaibinuer Yusufujiang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202419-72001California322 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 9 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAIBINUER YUSUFUJIANG, No. 19-72001

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-227-317

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Kaibinuer Yusufujiang petitions for review of the order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of a

motion to reopen removal proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

discretion, Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland, 32 F.4th 794, 800 (9th Cir. 2022), and we

deny the petition for review in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.