Andres Molina-Zavala v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202420-73191California584 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 9 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES MOLINA-ZAVALA, No. 20-73191; 21-274

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-734-430

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Andres Molina-Zavala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming without

opinion the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to reopen removal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). proceedings to seek recission of an April 2008 in absentia removal order. In a

companion case, Molina-Zavala petitions for review of the BIA’s order denying his

motion to reconsider its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.