Vela Flores v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202423-2069California1,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MERCEDES DE LOS ANGELES VELA No. 23-2069 FLORES; JOSE RONALDO Agency Nos.

HERNANDEZ VELA, A201-530-855

A201-530-854

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, WARDLAW, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously voted to grant Petitioners’ motion to submit the case on the briefs, without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(1). Mercedes De Los Angeles Vela Flores (“Vela”) and her son, Jose Ronaldo

Hernandez Vela,1 natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.