Rivas-De Contreras v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202423-3047California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARMITA JESIBEL RIVAS-DE No. 23-3047 CONTRERAS, Agency No.

A208-173-859

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Carmita Jesibel Rivas-De Contreras petitions for review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of an immigration

judge’s (IJ) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.