Zeitlin
Zeitlin v. Wetenhall
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIC ZEITLIN, No. 23-4035 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:20-cv-01067-CL v.
MEMORANDUM*
NATALIE M. WETENHALL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mark D. Clarke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 3, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
After two failed sales of his property, Eric Zeitlin filed suit against Natalie
Wetenhall, asserting a single claim of legal malpractice and seeking compensatory
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and consequential damages.1 The district court granted Wetenhall’s motion for
partial summary judgment as to compensatory damages. It then certified this
judgment as final under Federal Rule of…