Martinez-Velasquez

Martinez-Velasquez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202423-3894California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUSANA YASMIN MARTINEZ- No. 23-3894 VELASQUEZ; J.T., Agency Nos.

A220-203-593

Petitioners, A220-203-594 v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Susana Yasmin Martinez-Velasquez and her minor child J.T. are natives and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). citizens of El Salvador.1 Martinez-Velasquez seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.