Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20241:19-cv-00105California4,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. (ECF Nos. 130, 138, 179-195, 197-198, 200-202) NATURAL GAS FUEL SYSTEMS, INC.

D.B.A. MOMENTUM FUEL

TECHNOLOGY, et al., Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court are the parties’ motions in limine, filed on November 6, 2024. (ECF Nos. 179-85.) Oppositions to the motions were filed on November 20, 2024. (ECF Nos. 186-195.) Replies were filed on November 27, 2024. (ECF Nos. 197-198, 200-202.) A hearing was held on December 4, 2024. Counsel Matthew Clark, Chad Boyles, and Christopher Hagan appeared for Plaintiffs William and Joan Johnson (“Plaintiffs”); counsel Diane Wayland appeared for Intervenor Plaintiff Markel American Insurance Company as Subrogee of American Natural Gas, LLC (“Markel”); counsel Esther Holm, Ryan Nilsen, and Alyssa Garchie appeared for 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.