Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20241:19-cv-00105California1,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL

ORDER; PRETRIAL PROCEDURES;

v. ALLOWING LIMITED TESTIMONY BY

VIDEOCONFERENCE AND USE OF

NATURAL GAS FUEL SYSTEMS, INC. INDEPENDENT COURT REPORTER FOR

D.B.A. MOMENTUM FUEL PREPARATION OF UNOFFICIAL

TECHNOLOGY, et al., TRANSCRIPT

Defendants. (ECF No. 165)

17 A. Trial Briefs In the amended pretrial order (ECF No. 165), the Court permitted that trial briefs were optional. However, the Court amends its pretrial order to require that each party file a trial brief no later than January 9, 2025. The form and content of the trial brief must comply with Local Rule 285. Special attention shall be given in the trial brief to address reasonably anticipated disputes concerning the substantive law, jury instructions and/or admissibility of evidence. L.R. 285(a)(3). The parties need not include in the trial brief any issue that is adequately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.