Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20241:19-cv-00105California1,732 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL
ORDER; PRETRIAL PROCEDURES;
v. ALLOWING LIMITED TESTIMONY BY
VIDEOCONFERENCE AND USE OF
NATURAL GAS FUEL SYSTEMS, INC. INDEPENDENT COURT REPORTER FOR
D.B.A. MOMENTUM FUEL PREPARATION OF UNOFFICIAL
TECHNOLOGY, et al., TRANSCRIPT
Defendants. (ECF No. 165)
17 A. Trial Briefs In the amended pretrial order (ECF No. 165), the Court permitted that trial briefs were optional. However, the Court amends its pretrial order to require that each party file a trial brief no later than January 9, 2025. The form and content of the trial brief must comply with Local Rule 285. Special attention shall be given in the trial brief to address reasonably anticipated disputes concerning the substantive law, jury instructions and/or admissibility of evidence. L.R. 285(a)(3). The parties need not include in the trial brief any issue that is adequately…