Marroquin De Portillo v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20243:23-cv-00978California6,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBA MARROQUIN DE PORTILLO, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00978-WQH-VET individually and as successor in interest to 12 her deceased son, Lester Daniel ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Marroquin, DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF

Plaintiff,

DOCUMENTS

v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; LA

CRESHEIA LEE; SCOTT ROLLER;

OMAR ORTEGA; IVA NANUSEVIC;

MICHAEL CAMPOS; JOSEPH

GIESEMAN; ADRIEN CARRILLO;

19 BENJAMIN NAZERIAN; and DOES 9– 20, inclusive, Defendants. 22 Before the Court is Plaintiff Alba Marroquin De Portillo’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant County of San Diego (the “County”). Doc. No. (“Motion”). The County timely opposed the Motion. Doc. No. 26 (“Opposition”). The County also lodged the documents at issue for the Court’s in camera review. See Doc. Nos. 22, 25. Following the Court’s in camera review, and for the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.